Abstract:Legal system is a complex adaptive system, the deeply combination of law and intelligent technology can be applied in judicial justice, which can assist judicial error correction, make optimal decision, trigger erarly legal risks warning, etc., and can improve the quality and efficiency of judicial practice. But we also should pay more attention on the bias, loss of control and misdirection brought by technology to the legal field under the guise of technology neutrality. This paper firstly discusses the problems in the extraction of judicial information and puts forward some concrete measures to improve the effectiveness of semantic processing by adding the legal document reasoning part and standardizing the structure of legal text. Secondly, it proposes to add values into the judicial discretion model, and discusses the specific paths to establish a value review and supervision mechanism by expert group and promotes the interpretability of the algorithm. By establishing an internal and external supervision mechanism, only when the background, overall values and adopted rules of judicial intelligent system are understood by legal people, it can be truly served the legal system. Finally, as for the similarity case recommendation, the most tackling challenge in establishing judicial intelligent system, it analyzes the difficulties in the judgment of similarity cases. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of legal experts and the datacentric computing systems based on present artificial intelligent technology, it then points out that the manmachine cooperative cognitive system with comprehensive analysis ability will be the development tendency of the judicial intelligent system.